This research provides a detailed assessment of the progressive collapse susceptibility of reinforced concrete (RC) moment-resisting frames through the Alternate Load Path (ALP) method implemented using linear static analysis. The analytical framework follows UFC 4-023-03 and ASCE 7 provisions, employing dynamic load increase factors and material modification coefficients to account for the effects of dynamic response and material nonlinearity. A ten-story RC building, designed in accordance with the Iranian Seismic Code (Standard 2800) and the National Building Regulations (Part 9), was modeled to evaluate the influence of column location and story level on collapse propagation. Corner, exterior, and interior columns were removed at the first, sixth, and roof stories to simulate a comprehensive set of abnormal loading scenarios. Structural performance was quantified using vertical deformation at the removed-column location and demand-to-capacity ratios (D/C) for adjoining beams and columns. The results demonstrate that corner-column loss governs the response, generating the highest vertical displacements and the most critical D/C demands. Column removal at upper stories amplifies progressive-collapse potential due to reduced redundancy and fewer effective load-redistribution paths. While columns generally retained sufficient post-redistribution capacity, beams adjacent to the removed column exhibited significant overstress, indicating local failure susceptibility. Overall, the findings reveal that RC moment frames-even when designed in full compliance with contemporary seismic and structural provisions, may lack adequate robustness against localized member loss. These outcomes underscore the necessity of integrating progressive collapse assessment into design practice and highlight the importance of redundancy, continuity, and load-path optimization in achieving resilient structural systems.